Of Red's and Reporting:
A Critical Appraisal of www.mediamouse.org, stlimc.org, and indymedia.org

Recently a bit of attention has been given to the Michigan CofCC by such web sites as www. mediamouse.org and others of the extreme Left. According to their websites, their designed purpose is to cover events and report 'news' that other, more trustworthy, and regularly staffed media outlets in Michigan have 'failed' to report. Do I sense a bit of paranoia from their end??

In evaluating such 'news' articles posted on www.mediamouse.org, it doesn't take very long to find out what exactly they wish to report on, and who they want to spotlight in a feature article.

Let's start with the little fella up in the corner. The mouse with the raised fist. The same raised fist as every Communist Revolutionary around the globe. The same fist that strikes against all forms of authority from local to national leadership. The same fist that while promoting a doctrine of tolerance, will strike both literally and figuratively at those who will stand in the way of their anarchistic tendencies towards the destruction of all social order. The same fist that has resulted in the slaughter of the farmers in Zimbabwe is the same fist aimed at molding the opinions of children in your schools as they seek to destroy the values that has kept America from becoming like a Third World Slum.

This is in effect what mediamouse.org wishes to occur at the expense of our children. While claiming to be an Independent News Source, they also bill themselves as a 'media activist group'. Well, it doesn't take a genius to figure that they will try to report, distort, misreport and slander in order to generate the activism that goes along with their 'independent' news coverage. The utter hypocrisy of claiming to be independent while seeking to destroy those who don't share their social agenda! They are merely trying to incite activity by typical extreme leftist propaganda to rip away any shred of evidence of the moral and spiritual foundations of America.

Lets look at a few examples of the type of activities they cover, and who supports them, should reveal exactly how 'independent' they are:

They have been active in the harassment of potential recruits into the Military by staging protests at Armed Services recruiting offices. They are not only against the Iraq war, but encourage a 'peace pledge' against all war whatsoever. Like the typical hippie revolutionary of the 60's, they will try to stop invasion by singing in the streets and playing the bongo's. Sorry, it doesn't work like that. With the 9/11 slaughter of thousands of innocent people, these cowards are using the freedom of speech, while claiming to be 'independent', to undermine the effort to deal with muslim extremism.

They have been actively counter protesting all measures to enforce the borders and deal with the massive illegal immigration problem.
In the spring, a few of their 'independent' reporters along with a few scraggly punks made their presence known by playing drums, chanting and obstructing a peaceful, pro-American demonstration in Grand Rapids. With a filthy (literally) banner made of cheap fabric touted by a couple of very dirty young people, they sought to make a name for themselves. The 'unbiased and independent' reporters at mediamouse.org covered the event with highest accolades for the anti-American demonstrators. A look at the pictures of the demonstration at their web site tells the story. They want an America without laws or borders, at least until they have control.

They have actively demonstrated against President Bush by supporting the claim that he is a "War Criminal" (see the photos section)

They have actively supported such anarchist, terrorist organizations such as OnePeoplesProject, Anti-Racist Action, By Any Means Necessary, and others, by promoting their events, and staging demonstrations against those who they disagree with. Lawbreaking is encouraged. All of these activities while claiming to be 'Independent', 'Unbiased', etc. Yeah. Right. Remember, they are a 'media activist organization'.

They are active in trying to defeat the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative.
The type of activism they support is racist to the core in giving preferences based upon race. Their hand holding with the extreme left should be apparent by now.

They want editorials and stories that are race less, sexless, and classless.
So much for being 'Objective'.

They strongly discourage their 'flock' from weighing both sides of an issue.
Typical brainwashing technique. This is also the tactic of the cultist who demands a following through select information and will use intimidation to discourage a fair evaluation of opposing viewpoints. As proof of this, at one demonstration, after seeing his 'flock' starting to listen to the CofCC and Constitutional Issues, the hippie (I'm not kidding- mid 50's long gray pony tailed beatnik) leader told his 'flock' it was time to go. Fear of the truth is characteristic of the extreme left, and mediamouse.org.
Typical left wing extremist tactic: If you can't handle the issues, resort to personal attacks.

They will use phrases as scare tactics to discourage people from aligning with a group, or idea that they are opposed to.
In referring to the CofCC and its members as 'neo-nazi' or white supremacist (both lies-the CofCC is considered Separatist, there is a difference between the terms) their 'independent' 'unbiased' reporting is once again revealed for the sham that it is. Slander is the norm for the extremists at mediamouse.org.
Be advised that the CofCC is in complete opposition to anything that favors a strong central government and tramples the rights of the States. Platforms such as National Socialism, i.e. Nazism are leftist, and any such implementation in the United States will be fought against vehemently.


Some thoughts to consider:

1) In looking at the pictures and having met some of their 'activists', it is impossible to claim being 'Independent' while you favor the extreme left. Who are they trying to fool? Typical narrow minded extremism.

2) If they were truly independent, why are they consistently siding with the far left in affording both support and coverage of the people who are revolutionaries. See many of the books they review and recommend. Again, they are showing their true agenda while denying they have one. Hypocrisy. It seems that they are more biased than those whom they accuse of 'having an agenda'.

3) How can one be a 'media activist organization', adhere to anarchist policies, defame the character of those who stand in their way and still want to be considered 'Objective' and 'Independent' by the readers? The slop they pass around comes right out of Marx and Lenin.

4) If they are truly 'Independent' why the opposition to the Military?

5) If they are truly 'Independent', why the support of radical leftist domestic terrorist organizations such as 'Anti-Racist Action', 'Anti-Fascists', 'By any Means Necessary' and 'One Peoples Project'?

6) If they want a 'raceless' society, why support race-based programs such as Affirmative Action and Racial Quota's by opposing the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

The conclusion of the matter regarding mediamouse.org, stlimc.org and indymedia.org:
They are media/activist organizations designed to promote a social change by means of propaganda resulting in direct action that supports the extreme left anarchist and communist ideologies and methods.

www.mediamouse.org, stlimc.org and indymedia.org are anything but trustworthy and independent sources of information and should not be trusted in matters that pertain to the reporting of events, quoting of people, and the 'labeling' or 'exposing' of organizations and their members or supporters.